-------
 ,,

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,

 ,,
 ,,





 ,,
 ,,





 ,,

 

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,














 ,,









 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,







 ,,
 ,,
 ,,






























-
-





# )(






'













-











# -    " 















# [4] lists this spelling, with two yods added for ktiv male and not present
# in ktiv chaser. It isn't clear what kind of Academia rules allows adding
# a yod in this case...

-
# [3] lists this spelling, even in ktiv chaser. I don't understand why. The
# Academia rules for foreign words dictate that extra yods should be added
# already to the ktiv chaser - I don't belive there is exception for this
# for Arabic words (like there is an exception saying we should add ).
# Anyway, even if there were such an exception, there must be a yod after
# the  in vowel-less spelling...
#
#-
# similarly for ' and  - [3] lists ' and , and again I
# went against its decisions.
#'
#
'








-
-




#  is considered infantile language -  (pl. of ) is the proper word







 ,,,
 ,,,







 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,














-
-


# I don't know why the following has kubuts, but [3] says that...























####     :
#  
 ,,
#    ) (
 ,,
#   
 ,,
#  ,  

#  

#  

#  


#  * ,

#  

#   -  ,  

#  

# -,  ,  ,  ,  ,  
 ,,
#  


# -
 ,,,
#  

#  
 ,,
#  

# - ) :    !(
 ,,,
# -
 ,,
#  
 ,,
#  
 ,,
# added yod in . used as " ..."


# Slang words:
 ,,
 ,,
# note that  is slang... [3] spells it as '...


#   "". woo     ,   
#       







# The following are strange inflections of the Arameic word "".
# [2] and [3] lists those bizarre inflections. Strangely, "", a word
# I found in the papers, is not considered a correct word. I commented out
# the ones that I never saw actually used.
# 


# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 

######   ) ,    ,   (.
# )" - (










# )" - (


















# )" -   (


























# )" - (









# )" - (


# )" - (
# )" - (




# )" - (






# )" - (



# )" - (



# ) (















# ) (





# [3] and [4] say the correct vowel-less spelling of  is with just one
# yod. I don't understand why. TODO: reconsider this.


######  :
# ) (










# ) , (






# ) , (












# ) (















# ) (

# ) (

# note that [3] doesn't recognize , only ...





###### words from wolig.dat with additional he hamegama...









# See Academia's rules on why  is spelled with one yud. For ,
# that is my guess (based on the explicit rule to spell ).


######  


#
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,



















 ,,
 ,,









###### , ,  


















 ,,
 ,,



















-

-

-


-

-


 ,,
 ,,





 ,,

 ,,








' ,,

'


-
# see comment about / in wolig.dat
#
#-


-

-

-

'
 ,,

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
# [3] prefers , with . [4] allows both, but prefers . I do to.
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,



 ,,
 ,,

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
# [3] and [4] disagree about the number of yods that  should have.
# [4] puts chirik on the resh, and therefore two yods. [3] puts shwa on the
# resh, and therefore one yod - but this makes this word have a strange row
# of three schwas on after another! Nevertheless, I decided to go with [3]
# here, because all the other belifs and sicknesses above appear to have just
# one yod...
 ,,
######  
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
######    )   (:
###### ) ,  -(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#  not recognized by [2], but it is a common name.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#    ,   )   ...(. ,  -
#     "  "   .
#         --   -wolig.dat,
#     . : , , , , .
#             -,
#     .          
#  -   , ,  ) !(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#
######   - :
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######  ,   
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######   
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
######         ,  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######   ",  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#   ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#   ,
###### :
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
######  ) (:
#            -wolig.dat
#what's the correct spelling?
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# TODO: I'm not sure about the double yod here...
 ,
# Note: this is rav-millim's spelling, without an Aleph.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
' ,
 ,
#    ...
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
######   :
#    ,  ,      "
# ,     "":
 
 
 
 
 
 
#  is the correct ktiv hasar niqqud. TODO: Should I allow  also??
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ,
 ,
 
 
 
 ,
###### :
#       ) ...(  -wolig.dat  .



######   :


###### :
# ,
# ,
 ,
" ,
" ,
#" ,
#" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

 ,
' ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# "" is also common, but I don't think we should accept that.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# [4] says the ktiv chaser is , maleh is . I have no idea why.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

 ,

######  : )   ,    (
#  
 ,
 ,
 ,
# 
 ,
# ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

###### :




"





######  ':
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
# Note: [4] spells  in vowelled spelling, but  vowel-less. I can't find any reason to do that. [3] spells 
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
#  - see in wolig.dat
 ,,
 ,,






 ,,
 ,,








'













"


 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,







 ,,
#     ?
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,

 ,,
###   :




 ,,




















 ,,
 ,,










 ,,






 ,,



'










 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
# should I add these herbs?
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 

######  )       -wolig.dat
 
' 
 
 
 
 
######  :
# TODO: is it correct that the plural of " - " (and similar for all other
# acronyms)? [4] accepts this form, and I tend to as well, despite the fact
# that the plural of " " is obviously not " ".
"
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
# There isn't a complete concensus as to whether one should write " or
# ", and similarly for ". [4] prefers the final-letter versions - "
# and ". But [4] also accepts the non-final-letter versions as alternative
# spellings. [3] prefers a strange combination: " but ". The older [2]
# accepts only the non-final-letter versions: " and ".
# I decided to allow the final-letter versions only. This makes more sense
# when the acronym is read out as a real word (and the plural form is a good
# proof of that. compare " which is not commonly read out as a word).
# Also, I was told that this is the way these ranks are always spelled in
# the army.
#
# Another questions is whether these ranks have feminine variants, or whether
# the same words apply to females too. [4] commits the ultimate male-chauvinist
# faux-pas: it recognizes ", but not " or ", and mark all the
# nouns ", ", " as masculine. Again, I was told that in the army
# the special feminine forms ", ", etc., is commonly used. Some ranks,
# however, are used for both genders: e.g., .
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
# TODO: consider feminine and plural forms of ", ", just like ".
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#" is   , but is too easily confused with "...
#"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,,
"
"
##### :
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#####  :
#   -.          - 
# " , ,   - ,       ? 
#   ?  ?    ?    ?    ?
#        -,      ?
#    ?
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
##### :
'
'
'
'
'
'
#####   "",  .
#       . ]4[  ,     
#      ) ", "(.
"
"
###### :
#   (, , , ...)     wolig.dat.
-------



-------










-
-------








-
-------








-------








-------








-------








-------







-------








-------



-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------
#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat

-------
#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat

-------


-
-------


-
